6722116: CMS: Incorrect overflow handling when using parallel concurrent marking
Summary: Fixed CMSConcMarkingTask::reset() to store the restart address upon a marking stack overflow and to use it as the base, suitably aligned, for restarting the scan in CMSConcMarkingTask::do_scan_and_mark().
Reviewed-by: jcoomes, tonyp
--- a/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/concurrentMarkSweep/compactibleFreeListSpace.cpp Wed Aug 20 23:05:04 2008 -0700
+++ b/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/concurrentMarkSweep/compactibleFreeListSpace.cpp Tue Aug 26 14:54:48 2008 -0700
@@ -2790,10 +2790,11 @@
assert(n_threads > 0, "Unexpected n_threads argument");
const size_t task_size = rescan_task_size();
size_t n_tasks = (used_region().word_size() + task_size - 1)/task_size;
- assert((used_region().start() + (n_tasks - 1)*task_size <
- used_region().end()) &&
- (used_region().start() + n_tasks*task_size >=
- used_region().end()), "n_task calculation incorrect");
+ assert((n_tasks == 0) == used_region().is_empty(), "n_tasks incorrect");
+ assert(n_tasks == 0 ||
+ ((used_region().start() + (n_tasks - 1)*task_size < used_region().end()) &&
+ (used_region().start() + n_tasks*task_size >= used_region().end())),
+ "n_tasks calculation incorrect");
SequentialSubTasksDone* pst = conc_par_seq_tasks();
assert(!pst->valid(), "Clobbering existing data?");
pst->set_par_threads(n_threads);
@@ -2833,7 +2834,7 @@
assert(n_tasks == 0 ||
((span.start() + (n_tasks - 1)*task_size < span.end()) &&
(span.start() + n_tasks*task_size >= span.end())),
- "n_task calculation incorrect");
+ "n_tasks calculation incorrect");
SequentialSubTasksDone* pst = conc_par_seq_tasks();
assert(!pst->valid(), "Clobbering existing data?");
pst->set_par_threads(n_threads);
--- a/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/concurrentMarkSweep/concurrentMarkSweepGeneration.cpp Wed Aug 20 23:05:04 2008 -0700
+++ b/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/concurrentMarkSweep/concurrentMarkSweepGeneration.cpp Tue Aug 26 14:54:48 2008 -0700
@@ -3650,6 +3650,7 @@
CompactibleFreeListSpace* _cms_space;
CompactibleFreeListSpace* _perm_space;
HeapWord* _global_finger;
+ HeapWord* _restart_addr;
// Exposed here for yielding support
Mutex* const _bit_map_lock;
@@ -3680,7 +3681,7 @@
_term.set_task(this);
assert(_cms_space->bottom() < _perm_space->bottom(),
"Finger incorrectly initialized below");
- _global_finger = _cms_space->bottom();
+ _restart_addr = _global_finger = _cms_space->bottom();
}
@@ -3698,6 +3699,10 @@
bool result() { return _result; }
void reset(HeapWord* ra) {
+ assert(_global_finger >= _cms_space->end(), "Postcondition of ::work(i)");
+ assert(_global_finger >= _perm_space->end(), "Postcondition of ::work(i)");
+ assert(ra < _perm_space->end(), "ra too large");
+ _restart_addr = _global_finger = ra;
_term.reset_for_reuse();
}
@@ -3842,16 +3847,24 @@
int n_tasks = pst->n_tasks();
// We allow that there may be no tasks to do here because
// we are restarting after a stack overflow.
- assert(pst->valid() || n_tasks == 0, "Uninitializd use?");
+ assert(pst->valid() || n_tasks == 0, "Uninitialized use?");
int nth_task = 0;
- HeapWord* start = sp->bottom();
+ HeapWord* aligned_start = sp->bottom();
+ if (sp->used_region().contains(_restart_addr)) {
+ // Align down to a card boundary for the start of 0th task
+ // for this space.
+ aligned_start =
+ (HeapWord*)align_size_down((uintptr_t)_restart_addr,
+ CardTableModRefBS::card_size);
+ }
+
size_t chunk_size = sp->marking_task_size();
while (!pst->is_task_claimed(/* reference */ nth_task)) {
// Having claimed the nth task in this space,
// compute the chunk that it corresponds to:
- MemRegion span = MemRegion(start + nth_task*chunk_size,
- start + (nth_task+1)*chunk_size);
+ MemRegion span = MemRegion(aligned_start + nth_task*chunk_size,
+ aligned_start + (nth_task+1)*chunk_size);
// Try and bump the global finger via a CAS;
// note that we need to do the global finger bump
// _before_ taking the intersection below, because
@@ -3866,26 +3879,40 @@
// beyond the "top" address of the space.
span = span.intersection(sp->used_region());
if (!span.is_empty()) { // Non-null task
- // We want to skip the first object because
- // the protocol is to scan any object in its entirety
- // that _starts_ in this span; a fortiori, any
- // object starting in an earlier span is scanned
- // as part of an earlier claimed task.
- // Below we use the "careful" version of block_start
- // so we do not try to navigate uninitialized objects.
- HeapWord* prev_obj = sp->block_start_careful(span.start());
- // Below we use a variant of block_size that uses the
- // Printezis bits to avoid waiting for allocated
- // objects to become initialized/parsable.
- while (prev_obj < span.start()) {
- size_t sz = sp->block_size_no_stall(prev_obj, _collector);
- if (sz > 0) {
- prev_obj += sz;
+ HeapWord* prev_obj;
+ assert(!span.contains(_restart_addr) || nth_task == 0,
+ "Inconsistency");
+ if (nth_task == 0) {
+ // For the 0th task, we'll not need to compute a block_start.
+ if (span.contains(_restart_addr)) {
+ // In the case of a restart because of stack overflow,
+ // we might additionally skip a chunk prefix.
+ prev_obj = _restart_addr;
} else {
- // In this case we may end up doing a bit of redundant
- // scanning, but that appears unavoidable, short of
- // locking the free list locks; see bug 6324141.
- break;
+ prev_obj = span.start();
+ }
+ } else {
+ // We want to skip the first object because
+ // the protocol is to scan any object in its entirety
+ // that _starts_ in this span; a fortiori, any
+ // object starting in an earlier span is scanned
+ // as part of an earlier claimed task.
+ // Below we use the "careful" version of block_start
+ // so we do not try to navigate uninitialized objects.
+ prev_obj = sp->block_start_careful(span.start());
+ // Below we use a variant of block_size that uses the
+ // Printezis bits to avoid waiting for allocated
+ // objects to become initialized/parsable.
+ while (prev_obj < span.start()) {
+ size_t sz = sp->block_size_no_stall(prev_obj, _collector);
+ if (sz > 0) {
+ prev_obj += sz;
+ } else {
+ // In this case we may end up doing a bit of redundant
+ // scanning, but that appears unavoidable, short of
+ // locking the free list locks; see bug 6324141.
+ break;
+ }
}
}
if (prev_obj < span.end()) {
@@ -3938,12 +3965,14 @@
void handle_stack_overflow(HeapWord* lost);
};
-// Grey object rescan during work stealing phase --
-// the salient assumption here is that stolen oops must
-// always be initialized, so we do not need to check for
-// uninitialized objects before scanning here.
+// Grey object scanning during work stealing phase --
+// the salient assumption here is that any references
+// that are in these stolen objects being scanned must
+// already have been initialized (else they would not have
+// been published), so we do not need to check for
+// uninitialized objects before pushing here.
void Par_ConcMarkingClosure::do_oop(oop obj) {
- assert(obj->is_oop_or_null(), "expected an oop or NULL");
+ assert(obj->is_oop_or_null(true), "expected an oop or NULL");
HeapWord* addr = (HeapWord*)obj;
// Check if oop points into the CMS generation
// and is not marked
@@ -4001,7 +4030,7 @@
// in CMSCollector's _restart_address.
void Par_ConcMarkingClosure::handle_stack_overflow(HeapWord* lost) {
// We need to do this under a mutex to prevent other
- // workers from interfering with the expansion below.
+ // workers from interfering with the work done below.
MutexLockerEx ml(_overflow_stack->par_lock(),
Mutex::_no_safepoint_check_flag);
// Remember the least grey address discarded
@@ -6554,7 +6583,7 @@
if (obj != NULL) {
// Ignore mark word because this could be an already marked oop
// that may be chained at the end of the overflow list.
- assert(obj->is_oop(), "expected an oop");
+ assert(obj->is_oop(true), "expected an oop");
HeapWord* addr = (HeapWord*)obj;
if (_span.contains(addr) &&
!_bit_map->isMarked(addr)) {
@@ -7289,6 +7318,8 @@
_should_remember_klasses(collector->should_unload_classes())
{ }
+// Assumes thread-safe access by callers, who are
+// responsible for mutual exclusion.
void CMSCollector::lower_restart_addr(HeapWord* low) {
assert(_span.contains(low), "Out of bounds addr");
if (_restart_addr == NULL) {
@@ -7314,7 +7345,7 @@
// in CMSCollector's _restart_address.
void Par_PushOrMarkClosure::handle_stack_overflow(HeapWord* lost) {
// We need to do this under a mutex to prevent other
- // workers from interfering with the expansion below.
+ // workers from interfering with the work done below.
MutexLockerEx ml(_overflow_stack->par_lock(),
Mutex::_no_safepoint_check_flag);
// Remember the least grey address discarded