author | coleenp |
Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:55:09 -0400 | |
changeset 47765 | b7c7428eaab9 |
parent 47216 | 71c04702a3d5 |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
40656 | 1 |
/* |
46560
388aa8d67c80
8181449: Fix debug.hpp / globalDefinitions.hpp dependency inversion
kbarrett
parents:
41705
diff
changeset
|
2 |
* Copyright (c) 2016, 2017, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
40656 | 3 |
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. |
4 |
* |
|
5 |
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it |
|
6 |
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as |
|
7 |
* published by the Free Software Foundation. |
|
8 |
* |
|
9 |
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT |
|
10 |
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or |
|
11 |
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License |
|
12 |
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that |
|
13 |
* accompanied this code). |
|
14 |
* |
|
15 |
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version |
|
16 |
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, |
|
17 |
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. |
|
18 |
* |
|
19 |
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA |
|
20 |
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any |
|
21 |
* questions. |
|
22 |
*/ |
|
41705
332239c052cc
8165687: Fix license and copyright headers in jd9 under hotspot/test
stsmirno
parents:
41676
diff
changeset
|
23 |
|
40656 | 24 |
#include "precompiled.hpp" |
47765
b7c7428eaab9
8189610: Reconcile jvm.h and all jvm_md.h between java.base and hotspot
coleenp
parents:
47216
diff
changeset
|
25 |
#include "jvm.h" |
40656 | 26 |
#include "logging/logLevel.hpp" |
27 |
#include "logging/logTagLevelExpression.hpp" |
|
28 |
#include "logging/logTagSet.hpp" |
|
29 |
#include "unittest.hpp" |
|
30 |
#include "utilities/globalDefinitions.hpp" |
|
31 |
||
41676
45778d817919
8165698: Convert LogTagSet related internal tests to GTest
mlarsson
parents:
40913
diff
changeset
|
32 |
TEST(LogTagLevelExpression, combination_limit) { |
45778d817919
8165698: Convert LogTagSet related internal tests to GTest
mlarsson
parents:
40913
diff
changeset
|
33 |
size_t max_combinations = LogTagLevelExpression::MaxCombinations; |
45778d817919
8165698: Convert LogTagSet related internal tests to GTest
mlarsson
parents:
40913
diff
changeset
|
34 |
EXPECT_GT(max_combinations, LogTagSet::ntagsets()) |
45778d817919
8165698: Convert LogTagSet related internal tests to GTest
mlarsson
parents:
40913
diff
changeset
|
35 |
<< "Combination limit not sufficient for configuring all available tag sets"; |
45778d817919
8165698: Convert LogTagSet related internal tests to GTest
mlarsson
parents:
40913
diff
changeset
|
36 |
} |
45778d817919
8165698: Convert LogTagSet related internal tests to GTest
mlarsson
parents:
40913
diff
changeset
|
37 |
|
40656 | 38 |
TEST(LogTagLevelExpression, parse) { |
39 |
char buf[256]; |
|
40 |
const char* invalid_substr[] = { |
|
41 |
"=", "+", " ", "+=", "+=*", "*+", " +", "**", "++", ".", ",", ",," ",+", |
|
42 |
" *", "all+", "all*", "+all", "+all=Warning", "==Info", "=InfoWarning", |
|
40913
072bdbb90c13
8165215: Setting same UL tag multiple times matches wrong tagset
rehn
parents:
40656
diff
changeset
|
43 |
"BadTag+", "logging++", "logging*+", ",=", "gc+gc+" |
40656 | 44 |
}; |
45 |
const char* valid_expression[] = { |
|
46 |
"all", "gc", "gc,logging", "gc+logging", "logging+gc", "logging+gc,gc", "logging+gc*", "gc=trace", |
|
47 |
"gc=trace,logging=info", "logging+gc=trace", "logging+gc=trace,gc+logging=warning,logging", |
|
48 |
"gc,all=info", "logging*", "logging*=info", "gc+logging*=error", "logging*,gc=info" |
|
49 |
}; |
|
50 |
||
51 |
// Verify valid expressions parse without problems |
|
52 |
for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_expression); i++) { |
|
53 |
LogTagLevelExpression expr; |
|
54 |
EXPECT_TRUE(expr.parse(valid_expression[i])) << "Valid expression '" << valid_expression[i] << "' did not parse"; |
|
55 |
} |
|
56 |
||
57 |
// Verify we can use 'all' with each available level |
|
58 |
for (uint level = LogLevel::First; level <= LogLevel::Last; level++) { |
|
59 |
char buf[32]; |
|
60 |
int ret = jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "all=%s", LogLevel::name(static_cast<LogLevelType>(level))); |
|
61 |
ASSERT_NE(ret, -1); |
|
62 |
||
63 |
LogTagLevelExpression expr; |
|
64 |
EXPECT_TRUE(expr.parse(buf)); |
|
65 |
} |
|
66 |
||
67 |
// Verify invalid expressions do not parse |
|
68 |
for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_expression); i++) { |
|
69 |
for (size_t j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(invalid_substr); j++) { |
|
70 |
// Prefix with invalid substr |
|
71 |
LogTagLevelExpression expr; |
|
72 |
jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s%s", invalid_substr[j], valid_expression[i]); |
|
73 |
EXPECT_FALSE(expr.parse(buf)) << "'" << buf << "'" << " considered legal"; |
|
74 |
||
75 |
// Suffix with invalid substr |
|
76 |
LogTagLevelExpression expr1; |
|
77 |
jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s%s", valid_expression[i], invalid_substr[j]); |
|
78 |
EXPECT_FALSE(expr1.parse(buf)) << "'" << buf << "'" << " considered legal"; |
|
79 |
||
80 |
// Use only the invalid substr |
|
81 |
LogTagLevelExpression expr2; |
|
82 |
EXPECT_FALSE(expr2.parse(invalid_substr[j])) << "'" << invalid_substr[j] << "'" << " considered legal"; |
|
83 |
} |
|
84 |
||
85 |
// Suffix/prefix with some unique invalid prefixes/suffixes |
|
86 |
LogTagLevelExpression expr; |
|
87 |
jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "*%s", valid_expression[i]); |
|
88 |
EXPECT_FALSE(expr.parse(buf)) << "'" << buf << "'" << " considered legal"; |
|
89 |
||
90 |
LogTagLevelExpression expr1; |
|
91 |
jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "logging*%s", valid_expression[i]); |
|
92 |
EXPECT_FALSE(expr1.parse(buf)) << "'" << buf << "'" << " considered legal"; |
|
93 |
} |
|
94 |
} |
|
95 |
||
96 |
// Test the level_for() function for an empty expression |
|
97 |
TEST(LogTagLevelExpression, level_for_empty) { |
|
98 |
LogTagLevelExpression emptyexpr; |
|
99 |
ASSERT_TRUE(emptyexpr.parse("")); |
|
100 |
// All tagsets should be unspecified since the expression doesn't involve any tagset |
|
101 |
for (LogTagSet* ts = LogTagSet::first(); ts != NULL; ts = ts->next()) { |
|
102 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Unspecified, emptyexpr.level_for(*ts)); |
|
103 |
} |
|
104 |
} |
|
105 |
||
106 |
// Test level_for() with "all" without any specified level |
|
107 |
TEST(LogTagLevelExpression, level_for_all) { |
|
108 |
LogTagLevelExpression allexpr; |
|
109 |
ASSERT_TRUE(allexpr.parse("all")); |
|
110 |
// Level will be unspecified since no level was given |
|
111 |
for (LogTagSet* ts = LogTagSet::first(); ts != NULL; ts = ts->next()) { |
|
112 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Unspecified, allexpr.level_for(*ts)); |
|
113 |
} |
|
114 |
} |
|
115 |
||
116 |
// Test level_for() with "all=debug" |
|
117 |
TEST(LogTagLevelExpression, level_for_all_debug) { |
|
118 |
LogTagLevelExpression alldebugexpr; |
|
119 |
ASSERT_TRUE(alldebugexpr.parse("all=debug")); |
|
120 |
// All tagsets should report debug level |
|
121 |
for (LogTagSet* ts = LogTagSet::first(); ts != NULL; ts = ts->next()) { |
|
122 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Debug, alldebugexpr.level_for(*ts)); |
|
123 |
} |
|
124 |
} |
|
125 |
||
126 |
// Test level_for() with "all=off" |
|
127 |
TEST(LogTagLevelExpression, level_for_all_off) { |
|
128 |
LogTagLevelExpression alloffexpr; |
|
129 |
ASSERT_TRUE(alloffexpr.parse("all=off")); |
|
130 |
for (LogTagSet* ts = LogTagSet::first(); ts != NULL; ts = ts->next()) { |
|
131 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Off, alloffexpr.level_for(*ts)); |
|
132 |
} |
|
133 |
} |
|
134 |
||
135 |
// Test level_for() with an expression that has overlap (last subexpression should be used) |
|
136 |
TEST(LogTagLevelExpression, level_for_overlap) { |
|
137 |
LogTagLevelExpression overlapexpr; |
|
138 |
// The all=warning will be overridden with gc=info and/or logging+safepoint*=trace |
|
139 |
ASSERT_TRUE(overlapexpr.parse("all=warning,gc=info,logging+safepoint*=trace")); |
|
140 |
for (LogTagSet* ts = LogTagSet::first(); ts != NULL; ts = ts->next()) { |
|
141 |
if (ts->contains(PREFIX_LOG_TAG(gc)) && ts->ntags() == 1) { |
|
142 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Info, overlapexpr.level_for(*ts)); |
|
143 |
} else if (ts->contains(PREFIX_LOG_TAG(logging)) && ts->contains(PREFIX_LOG_TAG(safepoint))) { |
|
144 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, overlapexpr.level_for(*ts)); |
|
145 |
} else { |
|
146 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Warning, overlapexpr.level_for(*ts)); |
|
147 |
} |
|
148 |
} |
|
149 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Warning, overlapexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(class)>::tagset())); |
|
150 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Info, overlapexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc)>::tagset())); |
|
151 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, overlapexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, safepoint)>::tagset())); |
|
152 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, |
|
153 |
overlapexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, gc, class, safepoint, heap)>::tagset())); |
|
154 |
} |
|
155 |
||
156 |
// Test level_for() with an expression containing two independent subexpressions |
|
157 |
TEST(LogTagLevelExpression, level_for_disjoint) { |
|
158 |
LogTagLevelExpression reducedexpr; |
|
159 |
ASSERT_TRUE(reducedexpr.parse("gc+logging=trace,class*=error")); |
|
160 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(class)>::tagset())); |
|
161 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(safepoint, class)>::tagset())); |
|
162 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::NotMentioned, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(safepoint)>::tagset())); |
|
163 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::NotMentioned, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging)>::tagset())); |
|
164 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::NotMentioned, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc)>::tagset())); |
|
165 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, gc)>::tagset())); |
|
166 |
} |
|
167 |
||
168 |
// Test level_for() with an expression that is completely overridden in the last part of the expression |
|
169 |
TEST(LogTagLevelExpression, level_for_override) { |
|
170 |
LogTagLevelExpression overrideexpr; |
|
171 |
// No matter what, everything should be set to error level because of the last part |
|
172 |
ASSERT_TRUE(overrideexpr.parse("logging,gc*=trace,all=error")); |
|
173 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, overrideexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(class)>::tagset())); |
|
174 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, overrideexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging)>::tagset())); |
|
175 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, overrideexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc)>::tagset())); |
|
176 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, overrideexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, gc)>::tagset())); |
|
177 |
} |
|
178 |
||
179 |
// Test level_for() with a mixed expression with a bit of everything |
|
180 |
TEST(LogTagLevelExpression, level_for_mixed) { |
|
181 |
LogTagLevelExpression mixedexpr; |
|
182 |
ASSERT_TRUE(mixedexpr.parse("all=warning,gc*=debug,gc=trace,safepoint*=off")); |
|
183 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Warning, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging)>::tagset())); |
|
184 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Warning, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, class)>::tagset())); |
|
185 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Debug, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc, class)>::tagset())); |
|
186 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Off, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc, safepoint, logging)>::tagset())); |
|
187 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Off, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(safepoint)>::tagset())); |
|
188 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Debug, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, gc)>::tagset())); |
|
189 |
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc)>::tagset())); |
|
190 |
} |