/*

 * Copyright (c) 2016, 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

 * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.

 *

 * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it

 * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as

 * published by the Free Software Foundation.

 *

 * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT

 * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or

 * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License

 * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that

 * accompanied this code).

 *

 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version

 * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,

 * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.

 *

 * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA

 * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any

 * questions.

 */

#include "precompiled.hpp"

#include "jvm.h"

#include "logging/logLevel.hpp"

#include "logging/logSelectionList.hpp"

#include "logging/logTagSet.hpp"

#include "utilities/globalDefinitions.hpp"

#include "logTestUtils.inline.hpp"

#include "unittest.hpp"

TEST(LogSelectionList, combination_limit) {

  size_t max_combinations = LogSelectionList::MaxSelections;

  EXPECT_GT(max_combinations, LogTagSet::ntagsets())

      << "Combination limit not sufficient for configuring all available tag sets";

}

TEST(LogSelectionList, parse) {

  char buf[256];

  const char* valid_expression[] = {

    "logging=off,all", "gc,logging", "logging+gc", "logging+gc,gc", "gc=trace,logging=info",

    "logging+gc=trace,gc+logging=warning,logging", "gc,all=info"

  };

  // Verify valid expressions parse without problems

  for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_expression); i++) {

    LogSelectionList expr;

    EXPECT_TRUE(expr.parse(valid_expression[i])) << "Valid expression '" << valid_expression[i] << "' did not parse";

  }

  // Verify invalid expressions do not parse

  for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_expression); i++) {

    for (size_t j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(invalid_selection_substr); j++) {

      // Prefix with invalid substr

      LogSelectionList expr;

      jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s%s", invalid_selection_substr[j], valid_expression[i]);

      EXPECT_FALSE(expr.parse(buf)) << "'" << buf << "'" << " considered legal";

      // Suffix with invalid substr

      LogSelectionList expr1;

      jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s%s", valid_expression[i], invalid_selection_substr[j]);

      EXPECT_FALSE(expr1.parse(buf)) << "'" << buf << "'" << " considered legal";

      // Use only the invalid substr

      LogSelectionList expr2;

      EXPECT_FALSE(expr2.parse(invalid_selection_substr[j])) << "'" << invalid_selection_substr[j] << "'" << " considered legal";

    }

    // Suffix/prefix with some unique invalid prefixes/suffixes

    LogSelectionList expr;

    jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "*%s", valid_expression[i]);

    EXPECT_FALSE(expr.parse(buf)) << "'" << buf << "'" << " considered legal";

    LogSelectionList expr1;

    jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "logging*%s", valid_expression[i]);

    EXPECT_FALSE(expr1.parse(buf)) << "'" << buf << "'" << " considered legal";

  }

}

// Test the level_for() function for an empty expression

TEST(LogSelectionList, level_for_empty) {

  LogSelectionList emptyexpr;

  ASSERT_TRUE(emptyexpr.parse(""));

  // All tagsets should be unspecified since the expression doesn't involve any tagset

  for (LogTagSet* ts = LogTagSet::first(); ts != NULL; ts = ts->next()) {

    EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Unspecified, emptyexpr.level_for(*ts));

  }

}

// Test level_for() with an expression that has overlap (last subexpression should be used)

TEST(LogSelectionList, level_for_overlap) {

  LogSelectionList overlapexpr;

  // The all=warning will be overridden with gc=info and/or logging+safepoint*=trace

  ASSERT_TRUE(overlapexpr.parse("all=warning,gc=info,logging+safepoint*=trace"));

  for (LogTagSet* ts = LogTagSet::first(); ts != NULL; ts = ts->next()) {

    if (ts->contains(PREFIX_LOG_TAG(gc)) && ts->ntags() == 1) {

      EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Info, overlapexpr.level_for(*ts));

    } else if (ts->contains(PREFIX_LOG_TAG(logging)) && ts->contains(PREFIX_LOG_TAG(safepoint))) {

      EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, overlapexpr.level_for(*ts));

    } else {

      EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Warning, overlapexpr.level_for(*ts));

    }

  }

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Warning, overlapexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(class)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Info, overlapexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, overlapexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, safepoint)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace,

            overlapexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, gc, class, safepoint, heap)>::tagset()));

}

// Test level_for() with an expression containing two independent subexpressions

TEST(LogSelectionList, level_for_disjoint) {

  LogSelectionList reducedexpr;

  ASSERT_TRUE(reducedexpr.parse("gc+logging=trace,class*=error"));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(class)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(safepoint, class)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::NotMentioned, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(safepoint)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::NotMentioned, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::NotMentioned, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, gc)>::tagset()));

}

// Test level_for() with an expression that is completely overridden in the last part of the expression

TEST(LogSelectionList, level_for_override) {

  LogSelectionList overrideexpr;

  // No matter what, everything should be set to error level because of the last part

  ASSERT_TRUE(overrideexpr.parse("logging,gc*=trace,all=error"));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, overrideexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(class)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, overrideexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, overrideexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, overrideexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, gc)>::tagset()));

}

// Test level_for() with a mixed expression with a bit of everything

TEST(LogSelectionList, level_for_mixed) {

  LogSelectionList mixedexpr;

  ASSERT_TRUE(mixedexpr.parse("all=warning,gc*=debug,gc=trace,safepoint*=off"));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Warning, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Warning, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, class)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Debug, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc, class)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Off, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc, safepoint, logging)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Off, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(safepoint)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Debug, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, gc)>::tagset()));

  EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc)>::tagset()));

}