--- a/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/g1/concurrentMark.cpp Mon Mar 18 11:05:27 2013 -0700
+++ b/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/g1/concurrentMark.cpp Tue Mar 19 00:57:39 2013 -0700
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@
}
}
-void ConcurrentMark::set_phase(uint active_tasks, bool concurrent) {
+void ConcurrentMark::set_concurrency(uint active_tasks) {
assert(active_tasks <= _max_worker_id, "we should not have more");
_active_tasks = active_tasks;
@@ -793,6 +793,10 @@
_terminator = ParallelTaskTerminator((int) active_tasks, _task_queues);
_first_overflow_barrier_sync.set_n_workers((int) active_tasks);
_second_overflow_barrier_sync.set_n_workers((int) active_tasks);
+}
+
+void ConcurrentMark::set_concurrency_and_phase(uint active_tasks, bool concurrent) {
+ set_concurrency(active_tasks);
_concurrent = concurrent;
// We propagate this to all tasks, not just the active ones.
@@ -806,7 +810,9 @@
// false before we start remark. At this point we should also be
// in a STW phase.
assert(!concurrent_marking_in_progress(), "invariant");
- assert(_finger == _heap_end, "only way to get here");
+ assert(_finger == _heap_end,
+ err_msg("only way to get here: _finger: "PTR_FORMAT", _heap_end: "PTR_FORMAT,
+ _finger, _heap_end));
update_g1_committed(true);
}
}
@@ -974,20 +980,28 @@
gclog_or_tty->print_cr("[%u] leaving first barrier", worker_id);
}
- // let the task associated with with worker 0 do this
- if (worker_id == 0) {
- // task 0 is responsible for clearing the global data structures
- // We should be here because of an overflow. During STW we should
- // not clear the overflow flag since we rely on it being true when
- // we exit this method to abort the pause and restart concurent
- // marking.
- reset_marking_state(concurrent() /* clear_overflow */);
- force_overflow()->update();
-
- if (G1Log::fine()) {
- gclog_or_tty->date_stamp(PrintGCDateStamps);
- gclog_or_tty->stamp(PrintGCTimeStamps);
- gclog_or_tty->print_cr("[GC concurrent-mark-reset-for-overflow]");
+ // If we're executing the concurrent phase of marking, reset the marking
+ // state; otherwise the marking state is reset after reference processing,
+ // during the remark pause.
+ // If we reset here as a result of an overflow during the remark we will
+ // see assertion failures from any subsequent set_concurrency_and_phase()
+ // calls.
+ if (concurrent()) {
+ // let the task associated with with worker 0 do this
+ if (worker_id == 0) {
+ // task 0 is responsible for clearing the global data structures
+ // We should be here because of an overflow. During STW we should
+ // not clear the overflow flag since we rely on it being true when
+ // we exit this method to abort the pause and restart concurent
+ // marking.
+ reset_marking_state(true /* clear_overflow */);
+ force_overflow()->update();
+
+ if (G1Log::fine()) {
+ gclog_or_tty->date_stamp(PrintGCDateStamps);
+ gclog_or_tty->stamp(PrintGCTimeStamps);
+ gclog_or_tty->print_cr("[GC concurrent-mark-reset-for-overflow]");
+ }
}
}
@@ -1007,7 +1021,7 @@
if (concurrent()) {
ConcurrentGCThread::stsJoin();
}
- // at this point everything should be re-initialised and ready to go
+ // at this point everything should be re-initialized and ready to go
if (verbose_low()) {
gclog_or_tty->print_cr("[%u] leaving second barrier", worker_id);
@@ -1222,8 +1236,8 @@
uint active_workers = MAX2(1U, parallel_marking_threads());
- // Parallel task terminator is set in "set_phase()"
- set_phase(active_workers, true /* concurrent */);
+ // Parallel task terminator is set in "set_concurrency_and_phase()"
+ set_concurrency_and_phase(active_workers, true /* concurrent */);
CMConcurrentMarkingTask markingTask(this, cmThread());
if (use_parallel_marking_threads()) {
@@ -2349,9 +2363,11 @@
G1CMRefProcTaskProxy proc_task_proxy(proc_task, _g1h, _cm);
- // We need to reset the phase for each task execution so that
- // the termination protocol of CMTask::do_marking_step works.
- _cm->set_phase(_active_workers, false /* concurrent */);
+ // We need to reset the concurrency level before each
+ // proxy task execution, so that the termination protocol
+ // and overflow handling in CMTask::do_marking_step() knows
+ // how many workers to wait for.
+ _cm->set_concurrency(_active_workers);
_g1h->set_par_threads(_active_workers);
_workers->run_task(&proc_task_proxy);
_g1h->set_par_threads(0);
@@ -2377,12 +2393,29 @@
G1CMRefEnqueueTaskProxy enq_task_proxy(enq_task);
+ // Not strictly necessary but...
+ //
+ // We need to reset the concurrency level before each
+ // proxy task execution, so that the termination protocol
+ // and overflow handling in CMTask::do_marking_step() knows
+ // how many workers to wait for.
+ _cm->set_concurrency(_active_workers);
_g1h->set_par_threads(_active_workers);
_workers->run_task(&enq_task_proxy);
_g1h->set_par_threads(0);
}
void ConcurrentMark::weakRefsWork(bool clear_all_soft_refs) {
+ if (has_overflown()) {
+ // Skip processing the discovered references if we have
+ // overflown the global marking stack. Reference objects
+ // only get discovered once so it is OK to not
+ // de-populate the discovered reference lists. We could have,
+ // but the only benefit would be that, when marking restarts,
+ // less reference objects are discovered.
+ return;
+ }
+
ResourceMark rm;
HandleMark hm;
@@ -2438,6 +2471,10 @@
g1h->workers(), active_workers);
AbstractRefProcTaskExecutor* executor = (processing_is_mt ? &par_task_executor : NULL);
+ // Set the concurrency level. The phase was already set prior to
+ // executing the remark task.
+ set_concurrency(active_workers);
+
// Set the degree of MT processing here. If the discovery was done MT,
// the number of threads involved during discovery could differ from
// the number of active workers. This is OK as long as the discovered
@@ -2527,7 +2564,7 @@
active_workers = (uint) ParallelGCThreads;
g1h->workers()->set_active_workers(active_workers);
}
- set_phase(active_workers, false /* concurrent */);
+ set_concurrency_and_phase(active_workers, false /* concurrent */);
// Leave _parallel_marking_threads at it's
// value originally calculated in the ConcurrentMark
// constructor and pass values of the active workers
@@ -2543,7 +2580,7 @@
} else {
G1CollectedHeap::StrongRootsScope srs(g1h);
uint active_workers = 1;
- set_phase(active_workers, false /* concurrent */);
+ set_concurrency_and_phase(active_workers, false /* concurrent */);
// Note - if there's no work gang then the VMThread will be
// the thread to execute the remark - serially. We have
@@ -3923,7 +3960,7 @@
(2) When a global overflow (on the global stack) has been
triggered. Before the task aborts, it will actually sync up with
the other tasks to ensure that all the marking data structures
- (local queues, stacks, fingers etc.) are re-initialised so that
+ (local queues, stacks, fingers etc.) are re-initialized so that
when do_marking_step() completes, the marking phase can
immediately restart.
@@ -4371,7 +4408,8 @@
// ...and enter the second barrier.
_cm->enter_second_sync_barrier(_worker_id);
}
- // At this point everything has bee re-initialised and we're
+ // At this point, if we're during the concurrent phase of
+ // marking, everything has been re-initialized and we're
// ready to restart.
}