--- a/hotspot/test/gc/arguments/TestSurvivorAlignmentInBytesOption.java	Mon Dec 22 10:41:57 2014 -0800
+++ b/hotspot/test/gc/arguments/TestSurvivorAlignmentInBytesOption.java	Mon Dec 22 14:35:40 2014 -0800
@@ -51,8 +51,13 @@
         // Verify that without -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions usage of
         // SurvivorAlignmentInBytes option will cause JVM startup failure
         // with the warning message saying that that option is experimental.
+        String shouldFailMessage = String.format("JVM option '%s' is "
+                + "experimental.%nJVM startup should fail without "
+                + "-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions option", optionName);
         CommandLineOptionTest.verifyJVMStartup(
-                new String[]{optionIsExperimental}, null, ExitCode.FAIL, false,
+                new String[]{optionIsExperimental}, null,
+                shouldFailMessage, shouldFailMessage,
+                ExitCode.FAIL, false,
                 "-XX:-UnlockExperimentalVMOptions",
                 CommandLineOptionTest.prepareBooleanFlag(
                         unlockExperimentalVMOpts, false),
@@ -61,17 +66,28 @@
         // Verify that with -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions passed to JVM
         // usage of SurvivorAlignmentInBytes option won't cause JVM startup
         // failure.
+        String shouldPassMessage = String.format("JVM option '%s' is "
+                + "experimental.%nJVM startup should pass with "
+                + "-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions option", optionName);
+        String noWarningMessage = "There should be no warnings when use "
+                + "with -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions option";
         CommandLineOptionTest.verifyJVMStartup(
-                null, new String[]{optionIsExperimental}, ExitCode.OK, false,
+                null, new String[]{optionIsExperimental},
+                shouldPassMessage, noWarningMessage,
+                ExitCode.OK, false,
                 CommandLineOptionTest.prepareBooleanFlag(
                         unlockExperimentalVMOpts, true),
                 CommandLineOptionTest.prepareNumericFlag(optionName, 64));
 
-        // Verify that if specified SurvivorAlignmentInBytes is lower then
+        // Verify that if specified SurvivorAlignmentInBytes is lower than
         // ObjectAlignmentInBytes, then the JVM startup will fail with
         // appropriate error message.
+        shouldFailMessage = String.format("JVM startup should fail with "
+                + "'%s' option value lower than ObjectAlignmentInBytes", optionName);
         CommandLineOptionTest.verifyJVMStartup(
-                new String[]{valueIsTooSmall}, null, ExitCode.FAIL, false,
+                new String[]{valueIsTooSmall}, null,
+                shouldFailMessage, shouldFailMessage,
+                ExitCode.FAIL, false,
                 CommandLineOptionTest.prepareBooleanFlag(
                         unlockExperimentalVMOpts, true),
                 CommandLineOptionTest.prepareNumericFlag(optionName, 2));
@@ -79,16 +95,25 @@
         // Verify that if specified SurvivorAlignmentInBytes value is not
         // a power of 2 then the JVM startup will fail with appropriate error
         // message.
+        shouldFailMessage = String.format("JVM startup should fail with "
+                + "'%s' option value is not a power of 2", optionName);
         CommandLineOptionTest.verifyJVMStartup(
-                new String[]{mustBePowerOf2}, null, ExitCode.FAIL, false,
+                new String[]{mustBePowerOf2}, null,
+                shouldFailMessage, shouldFailMessage,
+                ExitCode.FAIL, false,
                 CommandLineOptionTest.prepareBooleanFlag(
                         unlockExperimentalVMOpts, true),
                 CommandLineOptionTest.prepareNumericFlag(optionName, 127));
 
         // Verify that if SurvivorAlignmentInBytes has correct value, then
         // the JVM will be started without errors.
+        shouldPassMessage = String.format("JVM startup should pass with "
+                + "correct '%s' option value", optionName);
+        noWarningMessage = String.format("There should be no warnings when use "
+                + "correct '%s' option value", optionName);
         CommandLineOptionTest.verifyJVMStartup(
                 null, new String[]{".*SurvivorAlignmentInBytes.*"},
+                shouldPassMessage, noWarningMessage,
                 ExitCode.OK, false,
                 CommandLineOptionTest.prepareBooleanFlag(
                         unlockExperimentalVMOpts, true),
@@ -96,8 +121,10 @@
 
         // Verify that we can setup different SurvivorAlignmentInBytes values.
         for (int alignment = 32; alignment <= 128; alignment *= 2) {
+            shouldPassMessage = String.format("JVM startup should pass with "
+                    + "'%s' = %d", optionName, alignment);
             CommandLineOptionTest.verifyOptionValue(optionName,
-                    Integer.toString(alignment),
+                    Integer.toString(alignment), shouldPassMessage,
                     CommandLineOptionTest.prepareBooleanFlag(
                             unlockExperimentalVMOpts, true),
                     CommandLineOptionTest.prepareNumericFlag(

--- a/hotspot/test/runtime/Safepoint/AssertSafepointCheckConsistency1.java	Mon Dec 22 10:41:57 2014 -0800
+++ b/hotspot/test/runtime/Safepoint/AssertSafepointCheckConsistency1.java	Mon Dec 22 14:35:40 2014 -0800
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  * @test
  * @bug 8047290
  * @summary Ensure that a Monitor::lock_without_safepoint_check fires an assert when it incorrectly acquires a lock which must always have safepoint checks.
- * @library /testlibrary /testlibrary/whitebox
+ * @library /testlibrary /../../test/lib
  * @build AssertSafepointCheckConsistency1
  * @run main ClassFileInstaller sun.hotspot.WhiteBox
  *                              sun.hotspot.WhiteBox$WhiteBoxPermission

--- a/hotspot/test/runtime/Safepoint/AssertSafepointCheckConsistency2.java	Mon Dec 22 10:41:57 2014 -0800
+++ b/hotspot/test/runtime/Safepoint/AssertSafepointCheckConsistency2.java	Mon Dec 22 14:35:40 2014 -0800
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  * @test
  * @bug 8047290
  * @summary Ensure that a Monitor::lock fires an assert when it incorrectly acquires a lock which must never have safepoint checks.
- * @library /testlibrary /testlibrary/whitebox
+ * @library /testlibrary /../../test/lib
  * @build AssertSafepointCheckConsistency2
  * @run main ClassFileInstaller sun.hotspot.WhiteBox
  *                              sun.hotspot.WhiteBox$WhiteBoxPermission

--- a/hotspot/test/runtime/Safepoint/AssertSafepointCheckConsistency3.java	Mon Dec 22 10:41:57 2014 -0800
+++ b/hotspot/test/runtime/Safepoint/AssertSafepointCheckConsistency3.java	Mon Dec 22 14:35:40 2014 -0800
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  * @test
  * @bug 8047290
  * @summary Ensure that Monitor::lock_without_safepoint_check does not assert when it correctly acquires a lock which must never have safepoint checks.
- * @library /testlibrary /testlibrary/whitebox
+ * @library /testlibrary /../../test/lib
  * @build AssertSafepointCheckConsistency3
  * @run main ClassFileInstaller sun.hotspot.WhiteBox
  *                              sun.hotspot.WhiteBox$WhiteBoxPermission

--- a/hotspot/test/runtime/Safepoint/AssertSafepointCheckConsistency4.java	Mon Dec 22 10:41:57 2014 -0800
+++ b/hotspot/test/runtime/Safepoint/AssertSafepointCheckConsistency4.java	Mon Dec 22 14:35:40 2014 -0800
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  * @test
  * @bug 8047290
  * @summary Ensure that Monitor::lock does not assert when it correctly acquires a lock which must always have safepoint checks.
- * @library /testlibrary /testlibrary/whitebox
+ * @library /testlibrary /../../test/lib
  * @build AssertSafepointCheckConsistency4
  * @run main ClassFileInstaller sun.hotspot.WhiteBox
  *                              sun.hotspot.WhiteBox$WhiteBoxPermission