# HG changeset patch
# User martin
# Date 1205216627 25200
# Node ID 429af02854d280b8079124ef1833592488800b1c
# Parent f35c86a7e82dcb854c8fe1f594059c2e678f374a
6609775: Reduce context switches in DelayQueue due to signalAll
Reviewed-by: alanb
Contributed-by: Doug Lea
diff -r f35c86a7e82d -r 429af02854d2 jdk/src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/DelayQueue.java
--- a/jdk/src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/DelayQueue.java Mon Mar 10 23:23:47 2008 -0700
+++ b/jdk/src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/DelayQueue.java Mon Mar 10 23:23:47 2008 -0700
@@ -69,10 +69,34 @@
implements BlockingQueue {
private transient final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();
- private transient final Condition available = lock.newCondition();
private final PriorityQueue q = new PriorityQueue();
/**
+ * Thread designated to wait for the element at the head of
+ * the queue. This variant of the Leader-Follower pattern
+ * (http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/POSA/POSA2/) serves to
+ * minimize unnecessary timed waiting. When a thread becomes
+ * the leader, it waits only for the next delay to elapse, but
+ * other threads await indefinitely. The leader thread must
+ * signal some other thread before returning from take() or
+ * poll(...), unless some other thread becomes leader in the
+ * interim. Whenever the head of the queue is replaced with
+ * an element with an earlier expiration time, the leader
+ * field is invalidated by being reset to null, and some
+ * waiting thread, but not necessarily the current leader, is
+ * signalled. So waiting threads must be prepared to acquire
+ * and lose leadership while waiting.
+ */
+ private Thread leader = null;
+
+ /**
+ * Condition signalled when a newer element becomes available
+ * at the head of the queue or a new thread may need to
+ * become leader.
+ */
+ private final Condition available = lock.newCondition();
+
+ /**
* Creates a new DelayQueue that is initially empty.
*/
public DelayQueue() {}
@@ -111,10 +135,11 @@
final ReentrantLock lock = this.lock;
lock.lock();
try {
- E first = q.peek();
q.offer(e);
- if (first == null || e.compareTo(first) < 0)
- available.signalAll();
+ if (q.peek() == e) {
+ leader = null;
+ available.signal();
+ }
return true;
} finally {
lock.unlock();
@@ -160,13 +185,8 @@
E first = q.peek();
if (first == null || first.getDelay(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS) > 0)
return null;
- else {
- E x = q.poll();
- assert x != null;
- if (q.size() != 0)
- available.signalAll();
- return x;
- }
+ else
+ return q.poll();
} finally {
lock.unlock();
}
@@ -185,23 +205,29 @@
try {
for (;;) {
E first = q.peek();
- if (first == null) {
+ if (first == null)
available.await();
- } else {
- long delay = first.getDelay(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
- if (delay > 0) {
- long tl = available.awaitNanos(delay);
- } else {
- E x = q.poll();
- assert x != null;
- if (q.size() != 0)
- available.signalAll(); // wake up other takers
- return x;
-
+ else {
+ long delay = first.getDelay(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
+ if (delay <= 0)
+ return q.poll();
+ else if (leader != null)
+ available.await();
+ else {
+ Thread thisThread = Thread.currentThread();
+ leader = thisThread;
+ try {
+ available.awaitNanos(delay);
+ } finally {
+ if (leader == thisThread)
+ leader = null;
+ }
}
}
}
} finally {
+ if (leader == null && q.peek() != null)
+ available.signal();
lock.unlock();
}
}
@@ -230,23 +256,28 @@
nanos = available.awaitNanos(nanos);
} else {
long delay = first.getDelay(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
- if (delay > 0) {
- if (nanos <= 0)
- return null;
- if (delay > nanos)
- delay = nanos;
- long timeLeft = available.awaitNanos(delay);
- nanos -= delay - timeLeft;
- } else {
- E x = q.poll();
- assert x != null;
- if (q.size() != 0)
- available.signalAll();
- return x;
+ if (delay <= 0)
+ return q.poll();
+ if (nanos <= 0)
+ return null;
+ if (nanos < delay || leader != null)
+ nanos = available.awaitNanos(nanos);
+ else {
+ Thread thisThread = Thread.currentThread();
+ leader = thisThread;
+ try {
+ long timeLeft = available.awaitNanos(delay);
+ nanos -= delay - timeLeft;
+ } finally {
+ if (leader == thisThread)
+ leader = null;
+ }
}
}
}
} finally {
+ if (leader == null && q.peek() != null)
+ available.signal();
lock.unlock();
}
}
@@ -303,8 +334,6 @@
c.add(q.poll());
++n;
}
- if (n > 0)
- available.signalAll();
return n;
} finally {
lock.unlock();
@@ -335,8 +364,6 @@
c.add(q.poll());
++n;
}
- if (n > 0)
- available.signalAll();
return n;
} finally {
lock.unlock();
@@ -485,6 +512,7 @@
return cursor < array.length;
}
+ @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public E next() {
if (cursor >= array.length)
throw new NoSuchElementException();
diff -r f35c86a7e82d -r 429af02854d2 jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/DelayQueue/Stress.java
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/DelayQueue/Stress.java Mon Mar 10 23:23:47 2008 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+ * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
+ *
+ * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
+ * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
+ * accompanied this code).
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
+ * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
+ * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
+ *
+ * Please contact Sun Microsystems, Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara,
+ * CA 95054 USA or visit www.sun.com if you need additional information or
+ * have any questions.
+ */
+
+import java.util.concurrent.*;
+import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.*;
+
+/**
+ * This is not a regression test, but a stress benchmark test for
+ * 6609775: Reduce context switches in DelayQueue due to signalAll
+ *
+ * This runs in the same wall clock time, but much reduced cpu time,
+ * with the changes for 6609775.
+ */
+public class Stress {
+
+ public static void main(String[] args) throws Throwable {
+
+ final DelayQueue q = new DelayQueue();
+ final long t0 = System.nanoTime();
+ for (long i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
+ final long expiry = t0 + i*10L*1000L*1000L;
+ q.add(new Delayed() {
+ public long getDelay(TimeUnit unit) {
+ return unit.convert(expiry - System.nanoTime(),
+ NANOSECONDS);
+ }
+ public int compareTo(Delayed x) {
+ long d = getDelay(NANOSECONDS)
+ - x.getDelay(NANOSECONDS);
+ return d < 0 ? -1 : d > 0 ? 1 : 0; }});
+ }
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < 300; i++)
+ new Thread() { public void run() {
+ try {
+ while (!q.isEmpty())
+ q.poll(10L, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
+ } catch (Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(); }
+ }}.start();
+ }
+}