Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:07:46 +0100 8149647: Incremental enhancements from build-infra
ihse [Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:07:46 +0100] rev 35765
8149647: Incremental enhancements from build-infra Reviewed-by: erikj
Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:05:39 -0800 Merge
lana [Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:05:39 -0800] rev 35764
Merge
Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:26:41 -0800 Merge
amurillo [Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:26:41 -0800] rev 35763
Merge
Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:27:15 +0100 Merge
thartmann [Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:27:15 +0100] rev 35762
Merge
Wed, 03 Feb 2016 17:51:47 +0100 8148751: [TESTBUG] compiler/whitebox/AllocationCodeBlobTest.java fails due to unexpected code cache allocation
thartmann [Wed, 03 Feb 2016 17:51:47 +0100] rev 35761
8148751: [TESTBUG] compiler/whitebox/AllocationCodeBlobTest.java fails due to unexpected code cache allocation Summary: Do all the measurements and then check the results to avoid unexpected code cache allocations. Reviewed-by: vlivanov
Wed, 03 Feb 2016 13:32:52 +0100 Merge
roland [Wed, 03 Feb 2016 13:32:52 +0100] rev 35760
Merge
Wed, 03 Feb 2016 10:58:50 +0100 8147645: get_ctrl_no_update() code is wrong
roland [Wed, 03 Feb 2016 10:58:50 +0100] rev 35759
8147645: get_ctrl_no_update() code is wrong Summary: Array.fill intrinsification code doesn't mark replaced control as dead Reviewed-by: kvn
Wed, 03 Feb 2016 10:39:49 +0100 8148753: Compilation fails due to field accesses on array types
zmajo [Wed, 03 Feb 2016 10:39:49 +0100] rev 35758
8148753: Compilation fails due to field accesses on array types Summary: Treat accesses to fields of array types as accesses to fields of java.lang.Object. Reviewed-by: kvn
Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:09:56 +0100 8148490: RegisterSaver::restore_live_registers() fails to restore xmm registers on 32 bit
thartmann [Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:09:56 +0100] rev 35757
8148490: RegisterSaver::restore_live_registers() fails to restore xmm registers on 32 bit Summary: Fixed stack offsets for xmm register saving/restoring code on 32 bit. Reviewed-by: kvn, mcberg
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:52:33 +0100 8003585: strength reduce or eliminate range checks for power-of-two sized arrays
kmo [Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:52:33 +0100] rev 35756
8003585: strength reduce or eliminate range checks for power-of-two sized arrays Summary: change ((x & m) u<= m) to always true and ((x & (m - 1)) u< m) into (m > 0) Reviewed-by: kvn, roland
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip