Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:02:10 -0700 6978533: CMS: Elide BOT update asserts until 6977974 is fixed correctly
ysr [Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:02:10 -0700] rev 6274
6978533: CMS: Elide BOT update asserts until 6977974 is fixed correctly Reviewed-by: jcoomes, jmasa, tonyp
Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:55:50 -0700 Merge
never [Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:55:50 -0700] rev 6273
Merge
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:51:47 -0700 6978249: spill between cpu and fpu registers when those moves are fast
never [Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:51:47 -0700] rev 6272
6978249: spill between cpu and fpu registers when those moves are fast Reviewed-by: kvn
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:22:16 -0700 6977640: Zero and Shark fixes
twisti [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:22:16 -0700] rev 6271
6977640: Zero and Shark fixes Summary: A number of fixes for Zero and Shark. Reviewed-by: twisti Contributed-by: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:14:00 -0700 6976372: # assert(_owner == Thread::current()) failed: invariant
never [Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:14:00 -0700] rev 6270
6976372: # assert(_owner == Thread::current()) failed: invariant Reviewed-by: kvn, twisti
Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:34:34 -0700 6975006: assert(check.is_deoptimized_frame()) failed: missed deopt
never [Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:34:34 -0700] rev 6269
6975006: assert(check.is_deoptimized_frame()) failed: missed deopt Reviewed-by: kvn, twisti
Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:38:23 -0700 6974176: ShouldNotReachHere, instanceKlass.cpp:1426
never [Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:38:23 -0700] rev 6268
6974176: ShouldNotReachHere, instanceKlass.cpp:1426 Reviewed-by: kvn, twisti
Fri, 20 Aug 2010 04:08:08 -0700 Merge
trims [Fri, 20 Aug 2010 04:08:08 -0700] rev 6267
Merge
Fri, 20 Aug 2010 03:47:09 -0700 6978726: Bump the HS19 build number to 07
trims [Fri, 20 Aug 2010 03:47:09 -0700] rev 6266
6978726: Bump the HS19 build number to 07 Summary: Update the HS19 build number to 07 Reviewed-by: jcoomes
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:08:58 -0400 Merge
tonyp [Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:08:58 -0400] rev 6265
Merge
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:44:33 -0400 Merge
johnc [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:44:33 -0400] rev 6264
Merge
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:59:06 -0700 6977924: Changes for 6975078 produce build error with certain gcc versions
johnc [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:59:06 -0700] rev 6263
6977924: Changes for 6975078 produce build error with certain gcc versions Summary: The changes introduced for 6975078 assign badHeapOopVal to the _allocation field in the ResourceObj class. In 32 bit linux builds with certain versions of gcc this assignment will be flagged as an error while compiling allocation.cpp. In 32 bit builds the constant value badHeapOopVal (which is cast to an intptr_t) is negative. The _allocation field is typed as an unsigned intptr_t and gcc catches this as an error. Reviewed-by: jcoomes, ysr, phh
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:39:21 -0700 6977970: CMS: concurrentMarkSweepGeneration.cpp:7947 assert(addr <= _limit) failed: sweep invariant
ysr [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:39:21 -0700] rev 6262
6977970: CMS: concurrentMarkSweepGeneration.cpp:7947 assert(addr <= _limit) failed: sweep invariant Summary: Allow for the possibility (when the heap is expanding) that the sweep might skip over and past, rather than necessarily step on, the sweep limit determined at the beginning of a concurrent marking cycle. Reviewed-by: jmasa, tonyp
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:40:00 -0400 6975964: G1: print out a more descriptive message for evacuation failure when +PrintGCDetails is set
tonyp [Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:40:00 -0400] rev 6261
6975964: G1: print out a more descriptive message for evacuation failure when +PrintGCDetails is set Summary: we're renaming "evacuation failure" to "to-space overflow". I'm also piggy-backing a small additional change which removes the "Mark closure took..." output. Reviewed-by: ysr, johnc
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:40:00 -0400 6974928: G1: sometimes humongous objects are allocated in young regions
tonyp [Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:40:00 -0400] rev 6260
6974928: G1: sometimes humongous objects are allocated in young regions Summary: as the title says, sometimes we are allocating humongous objects in young regions and we shouldn't. Reviewed-by: ysr, johnc
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:40:00 -0400 6959014: G1: assert(minimum_desired_capacity <= maximum_desired_capacity) failed: sanity check
tonyp [Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:40:00 -0400] rev 6259
6959014: G1: assert(minimum_desired_capacity <= maximum_desired_capacity) failed: sanity check Summary: There are a few issues in the code that calculates whether to resize the heap and by how much: a) some calculations can overflow 32-bit size_t's, b) min_desired_capacity is not bounded by the max heap size, and c) the assrt that fires is in the wrong place. The fix also includes some tidying up of the related verbose code. Reviewed-by: ysr, jmasa
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -16 +16 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip