Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:14:11 -0800 7112413: JVM Crash, possibly GC-related
jcoomes [Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:14:11 -0800] rev 11585
7112413: JVM Crash, possibly GC-related Summary: disable UseAdaptiveSizePolicy with the CMS and ParNew Reviewed-by: johnc, brutisso
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:58:23 -0500 7127706: G1: re-enable survivors during the initial-mark pause
tonyp [Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:58:23 -0500] rev 11584
7127706: G1: re-enable survivors during the initial-mark pause Summary: Re-enable survivors during the initial-mark pause. Afterwards, the concurrent marking threads have to scan them and mark everything reachable from them. The next GC will have to wait for the survivors to be scanned. Reviewed-by: brutisso, johnc
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:06:47 -0800 6484965: G1: piggy-back liveness accounting phase on marking
johnc [Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:06:47 -0800] rev 11583
6484965: G1: piggy-back liveness accounting phase on marking Summary: Remove the separate counting phase of concurrent marking by tracking the amount of marked bytes and the cards spanned by marked objects in marking task/worker thread local data structures, which are updated as individual objects are marked. Reviewed-by: brutisso, tonyp
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:08:58 -0500 7132398: G1: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid threshold: 9223372036854775807 > max (1073741824)
tonyp [Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:08:58 -0500] rev 11582
7132398: G1: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid threshold: 9223372036854775807 > max (1073741824) Summary: Was not passing the right old pool max to the memory pool constructor in the fix for 7078465. Reviewed-by: brutisso, johnc
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip