Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:42:17 +0100 8067768: Check for too small values for -Xmx
pliden [Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:42:17 +0100] rev 37088
8067768: Check for too small values for -Xmx Reviewed-by: jwilhelm, dfazunen
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:07:34 +0000 Merge
dsamersoff [Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:07:34 +0000] rev 37087
Merge
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:45:15 +0300 8151368: SA: Unexpected ArithmeticException in CompactHashTable
dsamersoff [Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:45:15 +0300] rev 37086
8151368: SA: Unexpected ArithmeticException in CompactHashTable Summary: Add missed null check Reviewed-by: iklam, dsamersoff Contributed-by: kubota.yuji@gmail.com
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:11:21 +0100 8151696: Print all regions on trace level to get same behavior as old PrintHeapAtGCExtended
sjohanss [Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:11:21 +0100] rev 37085
8151696: Print all regions on trace level to get same behavior as old PrintHeapAtGCExtended Reviewed-by: brutisso, jwilhelm
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:10:42 +0100 8151693: Move print_heap_before/after_gc to debug level
sjohanss [Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:10:42 +0100] rev 37084
8151693: Move print_heap_before/after_gc to debug level Reviewed-by: brutisso, jwilhelm
Sun, 13 Mar 2016 19:41:11 +0000 Merge
coleenp [Sun, 13 Mar 2016 19:41:11 +0000] rev 37083
Merge
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:23:20 -0500 8151728: jni test crashes JVM assert(_handle != __null) failed: resolving NULL handle
coleenp [Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:23:20 -0500] rev 37082
8151728: jni test crashes JVM assert(_handle != __null) failed: resolving NULL handle Summary: New assert needs to check for null. Reviewed-by: hseigel, gtriantafill
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:59:58 -0500 8140257: Add support for "gc service threads" to ConcurrentGCThread
drwhite [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:59:58 -0500] rev 37081
8140257: Add support for "gc service threads" to ConcurrentGCThread Summary: Push up the common run() and stop() methods from subclasses to ConcurrentGCThread, as well as declaration iof run_service() stop_service(). Reviewed-by: kbarrett, pliden
Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:26:47 +0100 8151604: Rely on options range checking rather than explict checks
brutisso [Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:26:47 +0100] rev 37080
8151604: Rely on options range checking rather than explict checks Reviewed-by: jwilhelm, drwhite, sangheki
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:02:04 +0100 Merge
mockner [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:02:04 +0100] rev 37079
Merge
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip