src/INICommand.cpp
branchv_0
changeset 28 596a724fbb83
parent 27 e9aad9dd823a
child 29 f0bf2755249f
--- a/src/INICommand.cpp	Sat Nov 28 18:10:47 2020 +0100
+++ b/src/INICommand.cpp	Sat Nov 28 20:59:29 2020 +0100
@@ -27,10 +27,12 @@
 #include <relpipe/cli/CLI.h>
 
 #include "INICommand.h"
+#include "lib/uri.h"
 #include "lib/INIReader.h"
 #include "lib/BasicUnescapingProcessor.h"
 #include "lib/BackspaceUnescapingProcessor.h"
 #include "lib/JavaPropertiesUnescapingProcessor.h"
+#include "lib/JavaPropertiesDialect.h"
 
 using namespace std;
 using namespace relpipe::writer;
@@ -171,10 +173,11 @@
 void INICommand::process(std::istream& input, std::shared_ptr<writer::RelationalWriter> writer, Configuration& configuration) {
 	FlatINIContentHandler handler(writer, configuration);
 	std::shared_ptr<INIReader> reader(INIReader::create(input));
-	reader->addUnescapingProcessor(std::make_shared<BasicUnescapingProcessor>(), "unescape-basic", true);
-	reader->addUnescapingProcessor(std::make_shared<JavaPropertiesUnescapingProcessor>(), "unescape-java-properties", false);
-	reader->addUnescapingProcessor(std::make_shared<BackspaceUnescapingProcessor>(false), "unescape-backspace-disorder", false);
-	reader->addUnescapingProcessor(std::make_shared<BackspaceUnescapingProcessor>(), "unescape-backspace", true);
+	reader->addUnescapingProcessor(std::make_shared<BasicUnescapingProcessor>(), unescaping::Basic, true);
+	reader->addUnescapingProcessor(std::make_shared<JavaPropertiesUnescapingProcessor>(), unescaping::JavaProperties, false);
+	reader->addUnescapingProcessor(std::make_shared<BackspaceUnescapingProcessor>(false), unescaping::BackspaceDisorder, false);
+	reader->addUnescapingProcessor(std::make_shared<BackspaceUnescapingProcessor>(), unescaping::Backspace, true);
+	reader->addDialect(std::make_shared<JavaPropertiesDialect>(), dialect::JavaProperties, false);
 	reader->addHandler(&handler);
 	// TODO: smart pointers vs. references: are we going to call addUnescapingProcessor() dynamically/conditionally or share instances? Then pointers will be better.
 	for (ParserOptionRecipe option : configuration.parserOptions) reader->setOption(convertor.to_bytes(option.uri), convertor.to_bytes(option.value));