6879943: CTW failure jdk6_18/hotspot/src/share/vm/c1/c1_LIR.hpp:2029
Reviewed-by: kvn, cfang
/*
* Copyright 2000-2002 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Sun Microsystems, Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara,
* CA 95054 USA or visit www.sun.com if you need additional information or
* have any questions.
*
*/
// Use AbstractRegister as shortcut
class AbstractRegisterImpl;
typedef AbstractRegisterImpl* AbstractRegister;
// The super class for platform specific registers. Instead of using value objects,
// registers are implemented as pointers. Subclassing is used so all registers can
// use the debugging suport below. No virtual functions are used for efficiency.
// They are canonicalized; i.e., registers are equal if their pointers are equal,
// and vice versa. A concrete implementation may just map the register onto 'this'.
class AbstractRegisterImpl {
protected:
int value() const { return (int)(intx)this; }
};
//
// Macros for use in defining Register instances. We'd like to be
// able to simply define const instances of the RegisterImpl* for each
// of the registers needed on a system in a header file. However many
// compilers don't handle this very well and end up producing a
// private definition in every file which includes the header file.
// Along with the static constructors necessary for initialization it
// can consume a significant amount of space in the result library.
//
// The following macros allow us to declare the instance in a .hpp and
// produce an enumeration value which has the same number. Then in a
// .cpp the the register instance can be defined using the enumeration
// value. This avoids the use of static constructors and multiple
// definitions per .cpp. In addition #defines for the register can be
// produced so that the constant registers can be inlined. These
// macros should not be used inside other macros, because you may get
// multiple evaluations of the macros which can give bad results.
//
// Here are some example uses and expansions. Note that the macro
// invocation is terminated with a ;.
//
// CONSTANT_REGISTER_DECLARATION(Register, G0, 0);
//
// extern const Register G0 ;
// enum { G0_RegisterEnumValue = 0 } ;
//
// REGISTER_DECLARATION(Register, Gmethod, G5);
//
// extern const Register Gmethod ;
// enum { Gmethod_RegisterEnumValue = G5_RegisterEnumValue } ;
//
// REGISTER_DEFINITION(Register, G0);
//
// const Register G0 = ( ( Register ) G0_RegisterEnumValue ) ;
//
#define AS_REGISTER(type,name) ((type)name##_##type##EnumValue)
#define CONSTANT_REGISTER_DECLARATION(type, name, value) \
extern const type name; \
enum { name##_##type##EnumValue = (value) }
#define REGISTER_DECLARATION(type, name, value) \
extern const type name; \
enum { name##_##type##EnumValue = value##_##type##EnumValue }
#define REGISTER_DEFINITION(type, name) \
const type name = ((type)name##_##type##EnumValue)
// Debugging support
inline void assert_different_registers(
AbstractRegister a,
AbstractRegister b
) {
assert(
a != b,
"registers must be different"
);
}
inline void assert_different_registers(
AbstractRegister a,
AbstractRegister b,
AbstractRegister c
) {
assert(
a != b && a != c
&& b != c,
"registers must be different"
);
}
inline void assert_different_registers(
AbstractRegister a,
AbstractRegister b,
AbstractRegister c,
AbstractRegister d
) {
assert(
a != b && a != c && a != d
&& b != c && b != d
&& c != d,
"registers must be different"
);
}
inline void assert_different_registers(
AbstractRegister a,
AbstractRegister b,
AbstractRegister c,
AbstractRegister d,
AbstractRegister e
) {
assert(
a != b && a != c && a != d && a != e
&& b != c && b != d && b != e
&& c != d && c != e
&& d != e,
"registers must be different"
);
}
inline void assert_different_registers(
AbstractRegister a,
AbstractRegister b,
AbstractRegister c,
AbstractRegister d,
AbstractRegister e,
AbstractRegister f
) {
assert(
a != b && a != c && a != d && a != e && a != f
&& b != c && b != d && b != e && b != f
&& c != d && c != e && c != f
&& d != e && d != f
&& e != f,
"registers must be different"
);
}
inline void assert_different_registers(
AbstractRegister a,
AbstractRegister b,
AbstractRegister c,
AbstractRegister d,
AbstractRegister e,
AbstractRegister f,
AbstractRegister g
) {
assert(
a != b && a != c && a != d && a != e && a != f && a != g
&& b != c && b != d && b != e && b != f && b != g
&& c != d && c != e && c != f && c != g
&& d != e && d != f && d != g
&& e != f && e != g
&& f != g,
"registers must be different"
);
}
inline void assert_different_registers(
AbstractRegister a,
AbstractRegister b,
AbstractRegister c,
AbstractRegister d,
AbstractRegister e,
AbstractRegister f,
AbstractRegister g,
AbstractRegister h
) {
assert(
a != b && a != c && a != d && a != e && a != f && a != g && a != h
&& b != c && b != d && b != e && b != f && b != g && b != h
&& c != d && c != e && c != f && c != g && c != h
&& d != e && d != f && d != g && d != h
&& e != f && e != g && e != h
&& f != g && f != h
&& g != h,
"registers must be different"
);
}