--- a/hotspot/src/os/bsd/vm/os_bsd.cpp Wed Feb 10 14:30:25 2016 +0100
+++ b/hotspot/src/os/bsd/vm/os_bsd.cpp Wed Feb 10 18:57:19 2016 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
- * Copyright (c) 1999, 2015, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 1999, 2016, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
@@ -4042,61 +4042,6 @@
// could have been signaled after a wait started
// 1 : signaled - thread is running or ready
//
-// Beware -- Some versions of NPTL embody a flaw where pthread_cond_timedwait() can
-// hang indefinitely. For instance NPTL 0.60 on 2.4.21-4ELsmp is vulnerable.
-// For specifics regarding the bug see GLIBC BUGID 261237 :
-// http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-glibc@lists.debian.org/msg10837.html.
-// Briefly, pthread_cond_timedwait() calls with an expiry time that's not in the future
-// will either hang or corrupt the condvar, resulting in subsequent hangs if the condvar
-// is used. (The simple C test-case provided in the GLIBC bug report manifests the
-// hang). The JVM is vulernable via sleep(), Object.wait(timo), LockSupport.parkNanos()
-// and monitorenter when we're using 1-0 locking. All those operations may result in
-// calls to pthread_cond_timedwait(). Using LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to use an older version
-// of libpthread avoids the problem, but isn't practical.
-//
-// Possible remedies:
-//
-// 1. Establish a minimum relative wait time. 50 to 100 msecs seems to work.
-// This is palliative and probabilistic, however. If the thread is preempted
-// between the call to compute_abstime() and pthread_cond_timedwait(), more
-// than the minimum period may have passed, and the abstime may be stale (in the
-// past) resultin in a hang. Using this technique reduces the odds of a hang
-// but the JVM is still vulnerable, particularly on heavily loaded systems.
-//
-// 2. Modify park-unpark to use per-thread (per ParkEvent) pipe-pairs instead
-// of the usual flag-condvar-mutex idiom. The write side of the pipe is set
-// NDELAY. unpark() reduces to write(), park() reduces to read() and park(timo)
-// reduces to poll()+read(). This works well, but consumes 2 FDs per extant
-// thread.
-//
-// 3. Embargo pthread_cond_timedwait() and implement a native "chron" thread
-// that manages timeouts. We'd emulate pthread_cond_timedwait() by enqueuing
-// a timeout request to the chron thread and then blocking via pthread_cond_wait().
-// This also works well. In fact it avoids kernel-level scalability impediments
-// on certain platforms that don't handle lots of active pthread_cond_timedwait()
-// timers in a graceful fashion.
-//
-// 4. When the abstime value is in the past it appears that control returns
-// correctly from pthread_cond_timedwait(), but the condvar is left corrupt.
-// Subsequent timedwait/wait calls may hang indefinitely. Given that, we
-// can avoid the problem by reinitializing the condvar -- by cond_destroy()
-// followed by cond_init() -- after all calls to pthread_cond_timedwait().
-// It may be possible to avoid reinitialization by checking the return
-// value from pthread_cond_timedwait(). In addition to reinitializing the
-// condvar we must establish the invariant that cond_signal() is only called
-// within critical sections protected by the adjunct mutex. This prevents
-// cond_signal() from "seeing" a condvar that's in the midst of being
-// reinitialized or that is corrupt. Sadly, this invariant obviates the
-// desirable signal-after-unlock optimization that avoids futile context switching.
-//
-// I'm also concerned that some versions of NTPL might allocate an auxilliary
-// structure when a condvar is used or initialized. cond_destroy() would
-// release the helper structure. Our reinitialize-after-timedwait fix
-// put excessive stress on malloc/free and locks protecting the c-heap.
-//
-// We currently use (4). See the WorkAroundNTPLTimedWaitHang flag.
-// It may be possible to refine (4) by checking the kernel and NTPL verisons
-// and only enabling the work-around for vulnerable environments.
// utility to compute the abstime argument to timedwait:
// millis is the relative timeout time
@@ -4208,10 +4153,6 @@
while (_Event < 0) {
status = pthread_cond_timedwait(_cond, _mutex, &abst);
- if (status != 0 && WorkAroundNPTLTimedWaitHang) {
- pthread_cond_destroy(_cond);
- pthread_cond_init(_cond, NULL);
- }
assert_status(status == 0 || status == EINTR ||
status == ETIMEDOUT,
status, "cond_timedwait");
@@ -4255,10 +4196,6 @@
assert_status(status == 0, status, "mutex_lock");
int AnyWaiters = _nParked;
assert(AnyWaiters == 0 || AnyWaiters == 1, "invariant");
- if (AnyWaiters != 0 && WorkAroundNPTLTimedWaitHang) {
- AnyWaiters = 0;
- pthread_cond_signal(_cond);
- }
status = pthread_mutex_unlock(_mutex);
assert_status(status == 0, status, "mutex_unlock");
if (AnyWaiters != 0) {
@@ -4391,7 +4328,7 @@
if (_counter > 0) { // no wait needed
_counter = 0;
status = pthread_mutex_unlock(_mutex);
- assert(status == 0, "invariant");
+ assert_status(status == 0, status, "invariant");
// Paranoia to ensure our locked and lock-free paths interact
// correctly with each other and Java-level accesses.
OrderAccess::fence();
@@ -4414,10 +4351,6 @@
status = pthread_cond_wait(_cond, _mutex);
} else {
status = pthread_cond_timedwait(_cond, _mutex, &absTime);
- if (status != 0 && WorkAroundNPTLTimedWaitHang) {
- pthread_cond_destroy(_cond);
- pthread_cond_init(_cond, NULL);
- }
}
assert_status(status == 0 || status == EINTR ||
status == ETIMEDOUT,
@@ -4442,24 +4375,14 @@
void Parker::unpark() {
int status = pthread_mutex_lock(_mutex);
- assert(status == 0, "invariant");
+ assert_status(status == 0, status, "invariant");
const int s = _counter;
_counter = 1;
+ status = pthread_mutex_unlock(_mutex);
+ assert_status(status == 0, status, "invariant");
if (s < 1) {
- if (WorkAroundNPTLTimedWaitHang) {
- status = pthread_cond_signal(_cond);
- assert(status == 0, "invariant");
- status = pthread_mutex_unlock(_mutex);
- assert(status == 0, "invariant");
- } else {
- status = pthread_mutex_unlock(_mutex);
- assert(status == 0, "invariant");
- status = pthread_cond_signal(_cond);
- assert(status == 0, "invariant");
- }
- } else {
- pthread_mutex_unlock(_mutex);
- assert(status == 0, "invariant");
+ status = pthread_cond_signal(_cond);
+ assert_status(status == 0, status, "invariant");
}
}