--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/nashorn/test/script/basic/JDK-8010946.js Wed Jul 03 12:39:28 2013 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2010, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+ * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
+ *
+ * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
+ * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
+ * accompanied this code).
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
+ * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
+ * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
+ *
+ * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
+ * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
+ * questions.
+ */
+
+/**
+ * JDK-8010946: AccessController.doPrivileged() doesn't work as expected.
+ * This is actually a broader issue of having Dynalink correctly handle
+ * caller-sensitive methods.
+ *
+ * @test
+ * @run
+ */
+
+// This is unprivileged code that loads privileged code.
+load(__DIR__ + "JDK-8010946-privileged.js")
+
+try {
+ // This should fail, even though the code itself resides in the
+ // privileged script, as we're invoking it without going through
+ // doPrivileged()
+ print("Attempting unprivileged execution...")
+ executeUnprivileged()
+ print("FAIL: Unprivileged execution succeeded!")
+} catch(e) {
+ print("Unprivileged execution failed with " + e)
+}
+
+print()
+
+// This should succeed, as it's going through doPrivileged().
+print("Attempting privileged execution...")
+executePrivileged()