test/jdk/java/lang/StringBuffer/TestSynchronization.java
changeset 47216 71c04702a3d5
parent 23010 6dadb192ad81
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/test/jdk/java/lang/StringBuffer/TestSynchronization.java	Tue Sep 12 19:03:39 2017 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2012, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+ * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
+ *
+ * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
+ * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
+ * accompanied this code).
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
+ * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
+ * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
+ *
+ * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
+ * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
+ * questions.
+ */
+
+/* @test
+ * @bug 6206780
+ * @summary Test that all public unsynchronized methods of StringBuffer are either directly or indirectly synchronized
+ */
+import java.lang.reflect.Constructor;
+import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
+import java.lang.reflect.Method;
+import java.lang.reflect.Modifier;
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.Arrays;
+import java.util.List;
+
+/**
+ * TestSynchronization tests whether synchronized methods calls on an object
+ * result in synchronized calls. Note that this may not test all cases desired.
+ * It only tests whether some synchronization has occurred on the object during
+ * the call chain, and can't tell whether the object was locked across all
+ * operations that have been performed on the object.
+ */
+public class TestSynchronization {
+
+    /**
+     * Define parameters used in methods of StringBuffer - admittedly a bit of
+     * hack but 'purpose-built' for StringBuffer. Something more general could
+     * probably be developed if the test needs to be more widely adopted.
+     * <p/>
+     * boolean char char[] int double float long Object CharSequence String
+     * StringBuffer StringBuilder
+     * <p/>
+     */
+    private static final boolean BOOLEAN_VAL = true;
+    private static final char CHAR_VAL = 'x';
+    private static final char[] CHAR_ARRAY_VAL = {'c', 'h', 'a', 'r', 'a', 'r',
+        'r', 'a', 'y'};
+    private static final int INT_VAL = 1;
+    private static final double DOUBLE_VAL = 1.0d;
+    private static final float FLOAT_VAL = 1.0f;
+    private static final long LONG_VAL = 1L;
+    private static final Object OBJECT_VAL = new Object();
+    private static final String STRING_VAL = "String value";
+    private static final StringBuilder STRING_BUILDER_VAL =
+            new StringBuilder("StringBuilder value");
+    private static final StringBuffer STRING_BUFFER_VAL =
+            new StringBuffer("StringBuffer value");
+    private static final CharSequence[] CHAR_SEQUENCE_VAL = {STRING_VAL,
+        STRING_BUILDER_VAL, STRING_BUFFER_VAL};
+
+    public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {
+        // First, test the tester
+        testClass(MyTestClass.class, /*
+                 * self-test
+                 */ true);
+        // Finally, test StringBuffer
+        testClass(StringBuffer.class, /*
+                 * self-test
+                 */ false);
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Test all the public, unsynchronized methods of the given class. If
+     * isSelfTest is true, this is a self-test to ensure that the test program
+     * itself is working correctly. Should help ensure correctness of this
+     * program if it changes.
+     * <p/>
+     * @param aClass - the class to test
+     * @param isSelfTest - true if this is the special self-test class
+     * @throws SecurityException
+     */
+    private static void testClass(Class<?> aClass, boolean isSelfTest) throws
+            Exception {
+        // Get all unsynchronized public methods via reflection.  We don't need
+        // to test synchronized methods.  By definition. they are already doing
+        // the right thing.
+        List<Method> methods = Arrays.asList(aClass.getDeclaredMethods());
+        for (Method m : methods) {
+            // skip synthetic methods, like default interface methods and lambdas
+            if (m.isSynthetic()) {
+                continue;
+            }
+            int modifiers = m.getModifiers();
+            if (Modifier.isPublic(modifiers)
+                    && !Modifier.isSynchronized(modifiers)) {
+                try {
+                    testMethod(aClass, m);
+                } catch (TestFailedException e) {
+                    if (isSelfTest) {
+                        String methodName = e.getMethod().getName();
+                        switch (methodName) {
+                            case "should_pass":
+                                throw new RuntimeException(
+                                        "Test failed: self-test failed.  The 'should_pass' method did not pass the synchronization test. Check the test code.");
+                            case "should_fail":
+                                break;
+                            default:
+                                throw new RuntimeException(
+                                        "Test failed: something is amiss with the test. A TestFailedException was generated on a call to "
+                                        + methodName + " which we didn't expect to test in the first place.");
+                        }
+                    } else {
+                        throw new RuntimeException("Test failed: the method "
+                                + e.getMethod().toString()
+                                + " should be synchronized, but isn't.");
+                    }
+                }
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    private static void invokeMethod(Class<?> aClass, final Method m,
+            final Object[] args) throws TestFailedException, Exception {
+        //System.out.println( "Invoking " + m.toString() + " with parameters " + Arrays.toString(args));
+        final Constructor<?> objConstructor;
+        Object obj = null;
+
+        objConstructor = aClass.getConstructor(String.class);
+        obj = objConstructor.newInstance("LeftPalindrome-emordnilaP-thgiR");
+
+        // test method m for synchronization
+        if (!isSynchronized(m, obj, args)) {
+            throw new TestFailedException(m);
+        }
+    }
+
+    private static void testMethod(Class<?> aClass, Method m) throws
+            Exception {
+        /*
+         * Construct call with arguments of the correct type. Note that the
+         * values are somewhat irrelevant. If the call actually succeeds, it
+         * means we aren't synchronized and the test has failed.
+         */
+        Class<?>[] pTypes = m.getParameterTypes();
+        List<Integer> charSequenceArgs = new ArrayList<>();
+        Object[] args = new Object[pTypes.length];
+        for (int i = 0; i < pTypes.length; i++) {
+            // determine the type and create the corresponding actual argument
+            Class<?> pType = pTypes[i];
+            if (pType.equals(boolean.class)) {
+                args[i] = BOOLEAN_VAL;
+            } else if (pType.equals(char.class)) {
+                args[i] = CHAR_VAL;
+            } else if (pType.equals(int.class)) {
+                args[i] = INT_VAL;
+            } else if (pType.equals(double.class)) {
+                args[i] = DOUBLE_VAL;
+            } else if (pType.equals(float.class)) {
+                args[i] = FLOAT_VAL;
+            } else if (pType.equals(long.class)) {
+                args[i] = LONG_VAL;
+            } else if (pType.equals(Object.class)) {
+                args[i] = OBJECT_VAL;
+            } else if (pType.equals(StringBuilder.class)) {
+                args[i] = STRING_BUILDER_VAL;
+            } else if (pType.equals(StringBuffer.class)) {
+                args[i] = STRING_BUFFER_VAL;
+            } else if (pType.equals(String.class)) {
+                args[i] = STRING_VAL;
+            } else if (pType.isArray() && pType.getComponentType().equals(char.class)) {
+                args[i] = CHAR_ARRAY_VAL;
+            } else if (pType.equals(CharSequence.class)) {
+                charSequenceArgs.add(new Integer(i));
+            } else {
+                throw new RuntimeException("Test Failed: not accounting for method call with parameter type of " + pType.getName() + " You must update the test.");
+            }
+        }
+        /*
+         * If there are no CharSequence args, we can simply invoke our method
+         * and test it
+         */
+        if (charSequenceArgs.isEmpty()) {
+            invokeMethod(aClass, m, args);
+        } else {
+            /*
+             * Iterate through the different CharSequence types and invoke the
+             * method for each type.
+             */
+            if (charSequenceArgs.size() > 1) {
+                throw new RuntimeException("Test Failed: the test cannot handle a method with multiple CharSequence arguments.  You must update the test to handle the method "
+                        + m.toString());
+            }
+            for (int j = 0; j < CHAR_SEQUENCE_VAL.length; j++) {
+                args[charSequenceArgs.get(0)] = CHAR_SEQUENCE_VAL[j];
+                invokeMethod(aClass, m, args);
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    @SuppressWarnings("serial")
+    private static class TestFailedException extends Exception {
+
+        final Method m;
+
+        public Method getMethod() {
+            return m;
+        }
+
+        public TestFailedException(Method m) {
+            this.m = m;
+        }
+    }
+
+    static class InvokeTask implements Runnable {
+
+        private final Method m;
+        private final Object target;
+        private final Object[] args;
+
+        InvokeTask(Method m, Object target, Object... args) {
+            this.m = m;
+            this.target = target;
+            this.args = args;
+        }
+
+        @Override
+        public void run() {
+            try {
+                m.invoke(target, args);
+            } catch (IllegalAccessException | IllegalArgumentException |
+                    InvocationTargetException e) {
+                e.printStackTrace();
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * isSynchronized tests whether the given method is synchronized or not by
+     * invoking it in a thread and testing the thread state after starting the
+     * thread
+     * <p/>
+     * @param m the method to test
+     * @param target the object the method is executed on
+     * @param args the arguments passed to the method
+     * @return true iff the method is synchronized
+     */
+    private static boolean isSynchronized(Method m, Object target,
+            Object... args) {
+        Thread t = new Thread(new InvokeTask(m, target, args));
+
+        Boolean isSynchronized = null;
+
+        synchronized (target) {
+            t.start();
+
+            while (isSynchronized == null) {
+                switch (t.getState()) {
+                    case NEW:
+                    case RUNNABLE:
+                    case WAITING:
+                    case TIMED_WAITING:
+                        Thread.yield();
+                        break;
+                    case BLOCKED:
+                        isSynchronized = true;
+                        break;
+                    case TERMINATED:
+                        isSynchronized = false;
+                        break;
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+        try {
+            t.join();
+        } catch (InterruptedException ex) {
+            ex.printStackTrace();
+        }
+
+        return isSynchronized;
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * This class is used to test the synchronization tester above. It has a
+     * method, should_pass, that is unsynchronized but calls a synchronized
+     * method. It has another method, should_fail, which isn't synchronized and
+     * doesn't call a synchronized method. The former should pass and the latter
+     * should fail.
+     */
+    private static class MyTestClass {
+
+        @SuppressWarnings("unused")
+        public MyTestClass(String s) {
+        }
+
+        @SuppressWarnings("unused")
+        public void should_pass() {
+            // call sync method
+            sync_shouldnt_be_tested();
+        }
+
+        @SuppressWarnings("unused")
+        public void should_fail() {
+        }
+
+        public synchronized void sync_shouldnt_be_tested() {
+        }
+    }
+}