src/hotspot/share/gc/cms/cmsLockVerifier.cpp
branchaefimov-dns-client-branch
changeset 59099 fcdb8e7ead8f
parent 58984 15e026239a6c
parent 59075 355f4f42dda5
child 59100 b92aac38b046
equal deleted inserted replaced
58984:15e026239a6c 59099:fcdb8e7ead8f
     1 /*
       
     2  * Copyright (c) 2002, 2015, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
       
     3  * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
       
     4  *
       
     5  * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
       
     6  * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
       
     7  * published by the Free Software Foundation.
       
     8  *
       
     9  * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
       
    10  * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
       
    11  * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
       
    12  * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
       
    13  * accompanied this code).
       
    14  *
       
    15  * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
       
    16  * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
       
    17  * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
       
    18  *
       
    19  * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
       
    20  * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
       
    21  * questions.
       
    22  *
       
    23  */
       
    24 
       
    25 #include "precompiled.hpp"
       
    26 #include "gc/cms/cmsLockVerifier.hpp"
       
    27 #include "gc/cms/concurrentMarkSweepThread.hpp"
       
    28 #include "memory/universe.hpp"
       
    29 #include "runtime/vmThread.hpp"
       
    30 
       
    31 ///////////// Locking verification specific to CMS //////////////
       
    32 // Much like "assert_lock_strong()", except that it relaxes the
       
    33 // assertion somewhat for the parallel GC case, where VM thread
       
    34 // or the CMS thread might hold the lock on behalf of the parallel
       
    35 // threads. The second argument is in support of an extra locking
       
    36 // check for CFL spaces' free list locks.
       
    37 #ifndef PRODUCT
       
    38 void CMSLockVerifier::assert_locked(const Mutex* lock,
       
    39                                     const Mutex* p_lock1,
       
    40                                     const Mutex* p_lock2) {
       
    41   if (!Universe::is_fully_initialized()) {
       
    42     return;
       
    43   }
       
    44 
       
    45   Thread* myThread = Thread::current();
       
    46 
       
    47   if (lock == NULL) { // a "lock-free" structure, e.g. MUT, protected by CMS token
       
    48     assert(p_lock1 == NULL && p_lock2 == NULL, "Unexpected caller error");
       
    49     if (myThread->is_ConcurrentGC_thread()) {
       
    50       // This test might have to change in the future, if there can be
       
    51       // multiple peer CMS threads.  But for now, if we're testing the CMS
       
    52       assert(myThread == ConcurrentMarkSweepThread::cmst(),
       
    53              "In CMS, CMS thread is the only Conc GC thread.");
       
    54       assert(ConcurrentMarkSweepThread::cms_thread_has_cms_token(),
       
    55              "CMS thread should have CMS token");
       
    56     } else if (myThread->is_VM_thread()) {
       
    57       assert(ConcurrentMarkSweepThread::vm_thread_has_cms_token(),
       
    58              "VM thread should have CMS token");
       
    59     } else {
       
    60       // Token should be held on our behalf by one of the other
       
    61       // of CMS or VM thread; not enough easily testable
       
    62       // state info to test which here.
       
    63       assert(myThread->is_GC_task_thread(), "Unexpected thread type");
       
    64     }
       
    65     return;
       
    66   }
       
    67 
       
    68   if (myThread->is_VM_thread()
       
    69       || myThread->is_ConcurrentGC_thread()
       
    70       || myThread->is_Java_thread()) {
       
    71     // Make sure that we are holding the associated lock.
       
    72     assert_lock_strong(lock);
       
    73     // The checking of p_lock is a spl case for CFLS' free list
       
    74     // locks: we make sure that none of the parallel GC work gang
       
    75     // threads are holding "sub-locks" of freeListLock(). We check only
       
    76     // the parDictionaryAllocLock because the others are too numerous.
       
    77     // This spl case code is somewhat ugly and any improvements
       
    78     // are welcome.
       
    79     assert(p_lock1 == NULL || !p_lock1->is_locked() || p_lock1->owned_by_self(),
       
    80            "Possible race between this and parallel GC threads");
       
    81     assert(p_lock2 == NULL || !p_lock2->is_locked() || p_lock2->owned_by_self(),
       
    82            "Possible race between this and parallel GC threads");
       
    83   } else if (myThread->is_GC_task_thread()) {
       
    84     // Make sure that the VM or CMS thread holds lock on our behalf
       
    85     // XXX If there were a concept of a gang_master for a (set of)
       
    86     // gang_workers, we could have used the identity of that thread
       
    87     // for checking ownership here; for now we just disjunct.
       
    88     assert(lock->owner() == VMThread::vm_thread() ||
       
    89            lock->owner() == ConcurrentMarkSweepThread::cmst(),
       
    90            "Should be locked by VM thread or CMS thread on my behalf");
       
    91     if (p_lock1 != NULL) {
       
    92       assert_lock_strong(p_lock1);
       
    93     }
       
    94     if (p_lock2 != NULL) {
       
    95       assert_lock_strong(p_lock2);
       
    96     }
       
    97   } else {
       
    98     // Make sure we didn't miss some other thread type calling into here;
       
    99     // perhaps as a result of future VM evolution.
       
   100     ShouldNotReachHere();
       
   101   }
       
   102 }
       
   103 #endif